This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
tamiwiki:projects:scanning-tami [2025/02/23 15:24] – wissotsky | tamiwiki:projects:scanning-tami [2025/02/24 13:24] (current) – wissotsky | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<WRAP center round todo 60%> | <WRAP center round todo 60%> | ||
- | Very WIP page(as of 18th February 2025), you can help by asking questions in the telegram group or in-person on Mondays | + | Very WIP page(as of 24th February 2025), you can help by asking questions in the telegram group or in-person on Mondays |
</ | </ | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
I was able smooth the depth over by rasterizing the median depth(according to RaDe-GS) | I was able smooth the depth over by rasterizing the median depth(according to RaDe-GS) | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{tamiwiki: | ||
But I still had some outliers in the depth data. | But I still had some outliers in the depth data. | ||
Line 72: | Line 74: | ||
I was able to fit a kernel density estimate to the depth data and then I manually found cutoff value where if the density after the global peak becomes lower it means that were past the primary peak any depth beyond that is an outlier. | I was able to fit a kernel density estimate to the depth data and then I manually found cutoff value where if the density after the global peak becomes lower it means that were past the primary peak any depth beyond that is an outlier. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{tamiwiki: | ||
After removing the depth outliers I was able to get much cleaner results | After removing the depth outliers I was able to get much cleaner results |